From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Mar 22 3:27:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk [212.22.195.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC50137B417 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from fanf by chiark.greenend.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 16oNC7-00022T-00 (Debian); Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:26:51 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:26:51 +0000 From: Tony Finch To: Ollivier Robert Cc: "M. Warner Losh" , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, rooneg@electricjellyfish.net Message-ID: <20020322112651.A5435@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ollivier Robert >According to M. Warner Losh: >> I have talked with green about this. He'd like me to fix patch to >> grok the generated diffs first. > >Why? Do we also have a modified patch? The original GNU patch with the >original GNU diffutils work fine so what's there to fix? >I'm confused. I seem to recall that at one point we went to patch 2.5 then >back but that's about it... FreeBSD is still using patch-2.1 because more recent versions of patch don't understand the output of `cvs diff` -- they fail to find the right file to patch if it is in a subdirectory. As far as I can see there have been no significant changes to the source. Tony. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message