From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 04:08:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E3516A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:08:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from slacknet.slacknet.com (slacknet.slacknet.com [204.228.135.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E73643D39 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:08:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rj45@slacknet.com) Received: from rj45 (helo=localhost) by slacknet.slacknet.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5khN-0005YU-Ah for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:08:01 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:08:01 -0700 (MST) From: RJ45 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: portversion not working ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:08:01 -0000 answer is portsdb -U sorry thx Rick On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, RJ45 wrote: > > when I run portversion -v to check against current pacakges installed and > the up to date versions many packages are reported as up to date but there > is a new versio nin hte ports avaliable. > this happened for example with freetype. > > I had > > freetype2-2.1.5_2 = up-to-date with port > > i did a portupgrade freetype2-2.1.5_2 > > and the result now is > > freetype2-2.1.7_2 > succeeds port (port has 2.1.5_2) > > > anyone has some hint for me? > > thanks > > Rick > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >