From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 3 10: 6:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08A437B9DC for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:06:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e63H6b125162; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:06:37 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" Cc: David Greenman , Bosko Milekic , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1 Message-ID: <20000703100636.V25571@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200007030820.BAA09516@implode.root.com> <20000703015027.U25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <3960B65B.30DF5DC1@vangelderen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3960B65B.30DF5DC1@vangelderen.org>; from jeroen@vangelderen.org on Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 11:50:51AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jeroen C. van Gelderen [000703 08:52] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Sacrificing performance to fix the small occurances where > > this is not the case is not worth it, the general case will always > > be there and will be more important. > > You seem to imply that you have proof that Bosko's patches > will negatively affect the general case I assume? No I don't, I have a lot of faith in Bosko's work but I wanted to make it clear that performance is several orders of magnitude more important than being able to reclaim memory. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message