Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:27:18 -0700 From: prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to scsi or not to scsi Message-ID: <20080626152718.278142e5@gom.home> In-Reply-To: <20080626235812.E4983@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080626092558.1a17d7d2@gom.home> <4863E58C.2060602@webrz.net> <20080626135907.39188d29@gom.home> <20080626235812.E4983@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > SCSI is SCSI. unless the device doesn't comply to standards > (unlikely) it just works! > thanks wojciech! i also came across the following in this article from 1999: "Seagate is committed to Ultra3 SCSI and plans to support the interface in future products," said Rudy Thibodeau, Seagate's Executive Director of High-Performance Product Marketing. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_April_15/ai_54381853 what that suggests is way back then seagate was moving to support ultra3, so the existing seagate in there should be one of these. therefore, the system will support any ultra3 scsi. -- In friendship, prad ... with you on your journey Towards Freedom http://www.towardsfreedom.com (website) Information, Inspiration, Imagination - truly a site for soaring I's
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080626152718.278142e5>