From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 18:14:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691BD16A41F; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:14:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (skippyii.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F279D43D4C; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:14:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.82.185]) by skippyii.compar.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j55IPTdw000564; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 14:25:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <003701c569fa$7e4e0530$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Randy Bush" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Arne_W=F6rner?= References: <17059.7150.269428.448187@roam.psg.com><20050605154415.77738.qmail@web41204.mail.yahoo.com> <17059.7801.923721.861116@roam.psg.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 14:15:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: you are in an fs with millions of small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:14:42 -0000 > >> to mirror someone's stuff, i need an fs which is happy with > >> a jillion small files. they're linux geeks, so suggested > >> reiserfs. but that appears (from -current's > >> /sys/i386/conf/NOTES) to only have read-only support on > >> freebsd. is there another path? > > I say, do you think a database might be a solution (e. g. mysql)? > > no. i am trying to do a site mirror, not tell the site how to > organize their data. UFS[2] will be just fine -- but you will need to ensure that you have more inodes than the default and increase dirhash to keep performance at a reasonable level. -- Matt Emmerton