From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 31 06:10:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D0A16A401 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from if@hetzner.co.za) Received: from mail1a.your-server.co.za (mail1a.your-server.co.za [196.7.18.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290AC13C4AC for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from if@hetzner.co.za) Received: from [192.168.2.25] (helo=hetzner.co.za) by mail1a.your-server.co.za with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HC8QN-0005FG-7X; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:54:27 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by hetzner.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HC8QK-0000Px-P5; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:54:24 +0200 To: Peter Jeremy From: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: Message from Peter Jeremy of "Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:12:10 +1100." <20070130231210.GR892@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:54:24 +0200 Message-Id: X-Authenticated-Sender: if@hetzner.co.za X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.88.4/2507/Wed Jan 31 01:00:28 2007) Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interesting speed benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:10:21 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, 2007-Jan-30 15:00:47 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > >huff@>>dump 0 -La -C 32 -f /dev/null /usr >& /tmp/null_dump > > DUMP: DUMP: 27162681 tape blocks on 1 volume > > DUMP: finished in 12961 seconds, throughput 2095 KBytes/sec > > Still fairly atrocious. What about: As a random datapoint that might or might not be related. In the last year or so I was pontificating about how much better SCSI was that IDE/ATA to my boss. I then did some benchmarks on my (CURRENT) system and discovered that an old 10Gig 7.5krpm UDMA33 disk significantly out perform some Seagate Cheatah LVD 10krpm disks. If you're interested, I'll see if I still have a copy of the benchmarks. Last time I looked, ahc(4) was still under GIANT. The ATA system has had a significant overhaul. Ian -- Ian Freislich