From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 09:09:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469DD16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:09:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from gentoo.netauth.com (roswell.pp.jippii.fi [62.142.244.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80CCD43D1D for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:09:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@sci.fi) Received: (qmail 8982 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Mar 2004 17:09:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:09:15 +0200 From: Mike Jackson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040309170915.GJ8152@gentoo.netauth.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040309145635.GG8152@gentoo.netauth.com> <404DEF4D.1050800@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <404DEF4D.1050800@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: firewall rules for mail gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:09:17 -0000 Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. (kdk@daleco.biz) wrote: > > have something to do with it. If the machine > is running NAT/divert whatever, it might > well be diverting before blocking? But I'm > wrong so often it's not very funny ... and > I use ipfw instead of ipf..... One last thing, I forgot to mention that I am running NAT. iprules.nat -- map xl0 192.168.1.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 -- mike