From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 22:45:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062F416A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03BA43D1D for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Sun, 05 Dec 2004 14:45:28 -0800 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id DA2D85D04; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:45:27 -0800 (PST) To: Tobias Roth In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:03:51 +0100." <20041205110351.GA29889@droopy.unibe.ch> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 14:45:27 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20041205224527.DA2D85D04@ptavv.es.net> cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org cc: Kiffin Gish Subject: Re: Wireless hiccup when ifconfig_xl0 enabled... X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:45:29 -0000 > Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 12:03:51 +0100 > From: Tobias Roth > Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:15:29AM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > > > > How can I have both statements enabled so that it will automatically choose the right connection on startup without having it do a hiccup for two minutes when I am on the move, e.g. wireless? > > https://projects.fsck.ch/profile/ > > allthough maybe a bit overkill for your purpose... > > and I didn't really get around to work on this the last few months, so > it's likely that you have to do a little bit of adjusting of the patches > to get it to work with 5.3 -stable (nothing complicated though). > > i'll promise that i'll start working on it again very-soon-now (tm), so > it might eventually get to the state where we can consider including it in > -current. I am running it under 5.3 Stable and I've had no problems at all. Of course, every configurations different, so YMMV. Rest assured that I would have reported any problems to Tobias. (I am working on some enhancements, but to do what I really want to do will require enhancement to union mounts and I would not bet on my getting that done. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634