Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:25:22 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with "cvs" on freefall (fwd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901231323450.21631-100000@s204m82.isp.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199901231947.DAA00829@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
we recompiled it from latest sources from freefall's CVS tree. I admit to not looking to see if it was -RELENG2_2 or what because archie checked it out. On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > > > At work we use CVS exensively, and we've had 'strange' problems using > > > CVS 1.10 on repositories built with CVS 1.9 when mixing different > > > versions of the cvs binary. (The remote version is different from the > > > local version, etc...) > > > > > > I'm not (yet) convinced that CVS 1.10 is ready for use in mixed > > > environments, and since CVS 1.9 is the default FreeBSD version, I > > > wouldn't switch. > > > > We're not suggesting switching just recompiling it from source and > > reinstallign it on freefall. The same verrsion that's there already > > but there are some bugfixes that have been > > committed and it's odd that our own central CVS machine hasn't been > > updated. > > I've held back because jkh was threatening to do a proper freefall update. > > Where did the binary come from? RELENG_2_2? Whistle's cvs tree? > > Cheers, > -Peter > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901231323450.21631-100000>