From owner-cvs-all Thu Mar 28 2:16:35 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BDC37B417; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24234; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:16:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from h185.229.dialup.iptcom.net (h185.229.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.229.185]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA47514; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:16:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk From: Maxim Sobolev To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200203280958.g2S9w8B05824@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200203280958.g2S9w8B05824@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kHodRkEA5XYBl3tzpLpi" X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 28 Mar 2002 12:16:05 +0200 Message-Id: <1017310574.580.20.camel@notebook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-kHodRkEA5XYBl3tzpLpi Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 11:58, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > sobomax 2002/03/28 01:58:08 PST >=20 > Modified files: > Mk bsd.port.mk=20 > Log: > The second, and I hope the last, revision of speedup patch - make USE_S= UBMAKE > working as advertised. This should fix mod_phpX and probably some other= 30 > ports that use USE_SUBMAKE. Default behaviour remains exactly the same. The whole affair (the problem spotted by knu and this one) showed that bento testing, is important, but should not be used as a substitute for ordinary peer review and testing, because bento's bsd.port.mk usage pattern is quite poor. Unfortunately, I suspect that even though my patch was available for more that two weeks but only few individuals actually gave it a try. That's the real problem, which needs to be addressed somehow. -Maxim --=-kHodRkEA5XYBl3tzpLpi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8ou1loNu5t4iCBa8RAhUNAJ9MNno2ZaVYkyx6sFizyCbDVRFJFgCfY+/I m9WjnRp7sBeZeu1+IaA4kQg= =UqBo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kHodRkEA5XYBl3tzpLpi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message