From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 27 20:44: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Pegasus.cc.ucf.edu [132.170.240.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFABF37B7EF for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 20:43:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ewayte@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu) Received: from pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (pegasus.cc.ucf.edu [132.170.240.30]) Ident [ewayte] by pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE5D3565; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:43:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:43:57 -0500 (EST) From: Eric Wayte To: Youlgok Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Q] comparison of sshes In-Reply-To: <38B7E56B.8B2201C@attglobal.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to the OpenSSH page (http://www.openssh.org/), support of SSH 2.0 is in progress. This will be a Good Thing as SSH 2.0 is currently supported only in an expensive commercial product. More details here: http://www.openssh.org/history.html On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Youlgok wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 09:38:36 -0500 > From: Youlgok > To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: [Q] comparison of sshes > > What is the major differences in OpenSSH-1.2.2, SSH-1.2.27 and > SSH2-2.0.13? As I understand, OpenSSH is inter operable with SSH, but > SSH2. Which one is more secure: OpenSSH or SSH and SSH2? > > I just installed OpenSSH-1.2.2 and from Windows machine it can be > connected by ssh, but ssh2. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message