From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 11 16:35:49 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B8D16A41F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84F8B43D7B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 28565 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2005 16:35:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
	by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 11 Nov 2005 16:35:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 16485 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2005 16:34:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
	by 0 with SMTP; 11 Nov 2005 16:34:36 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62CDBA14;
	Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:34:13 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:34:13 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Message-ID: <20051111183413.5e70164b@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051111161350.GA12336@soaustin.net>
References: <200511111029.jABATMW9087903@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20051111133654.53679f43@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<20051111161350.GA12336@soaustin.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.15 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@FreeBSD.org>,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.database.mk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:35:49 -0000

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:13:50 -0600
linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:36:54PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Can we be _consistent_ in respect of the *_DATABASE* variables ? E.g.
> > BROKEN_WITH_DATABASE (it should be a enumeration and work for
> > all databases)
> 
> Please, if we do this, let's fix the bug that BROKEN is set instead
> of IGNORE in these cases. 


So you want to call it IGNORE_WITH_DATABASE or just set INGNORE instead
of BROKEN ?

-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #418:
Sysadmins busy fighting SPAM