From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 19 2: 4:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-53.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CBF37B401; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4D0C66C11; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:04:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 02:04:52 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Nevermind , Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: COMMENT in makefiles (Re: [wiz@netbsd.org: CVS commit: pkgsrc]) Message-ID: <20010219020452.A40459@mollari.cthul.hu> References: <20010218171737.B44211@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200102181927.f1IJR0n01529@vic.sabbo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102181927.f1IJR0n01529@vic.sabbo.net>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 09:27:00PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 09:27:00PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > >> Log Message: > > >> Update to new COMMENT style: COMMENT var in Makefile instead of pkg/= COMM=3D > > ENT. > >=20 > > > What do people think about this change? Personally, I think it would > > > be great..frees up another 4500 inodes from the ports collection. > >=20 > > I think that should be useful. I have slow hdds, so it will be useful w= hile > > cvsuping, while make readme'ing and so on.=3D20 >=20 > I'm also voting for this change, however IMO Makefile a best place > for a COMMENT (Makefile's from our ports collection are already overloaded > with variables). I would propose to put it into pkg-descr, just like WWW > line. Another possible benefit for having it in pkg-descr is that you can Well, I don't agree there are good enough reasons to do it this way..it seems gratuitously different and it makes the pkg-descr file more difficult to read (comments often aren't very clear descriptions because of size constraints). Kris --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6kO/EWry0BWjoQKURAvTXAJ9Xpc8OMVJ9x5ZpWSenQNnik3RNSACg9V39 sOiCQk4+D93LBDNHcji+gvE= =zYpN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message