From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 19:05:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4F916A4D0; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2792F13C4C1; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l36J5LeB019933; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:05:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 15:05:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20070407023855.ede13b76.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200704061351.30424.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070407032643.72fd55df.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070407032643.72fd55df.nork@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704061505.18799.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/3029/Fri Apr 6 12:53:11 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Norikatsu Shigemura Subject: Re: Cannot mount linprocfs by unresolving sysvs?m symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:05:23 -0000 On Friday 06 April 2007 02:26 pm, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:51:20 -0400 > > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > --- linprocfs.c 30 Mar 2007 17:56:44 -0000 1.108 > > > +++ linprocfs.c 6 Apr 2007 17:33:05 -0000 > > > @@ -1238,3 +1238,5 @@ > > > PSEUDOFS(linprocfs, 1); > > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, linux, 1, 1, 1); > > > MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, procfs, 1, 1, 1); > > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvmsg, 1, 1, 1); > > > +MODULE_DEPEND(linprocfs, sysvsem, 1, 1, 1); > > > > Looks good. I will commit it shortly. > > BTW, 'linux' module depends on these modules. Is loading > > 'dependency of dependency' broken? Should we have to explicitly > > tell it to load the dependencies? Am I missing something here? > > :-( > > 'dependency of dependency' you saied is not broken. It's > specification:-) of kernel symbol resolver. It can resolve > one level export symbols:-(. Okay, can we fix the 'specification', then? ;-) Jung-uk Kim