From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 15:08:23 2011
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033901065672
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 15:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rik@inse.ru)
Received: from ns.rikbsd.org (ns.rikbsd.org [95.143.215.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577378FC1C
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 15:08:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wn.rikbsd.org [192.168.1.254])
	by ns.rikbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7E1D25D551;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2011 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EDCE047.7060309@inse.ru>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:16:23 +0400
From: Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20110906)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
References: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>
	<4EDCD9AD.1000504@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4EDCD9AD.1000504@missouri.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>,
	"Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject: Re: Move ctm to ports?
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:08:23 -0000

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>>>> system, and making it into a port?
>
> OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports.  I'll see if I can get a 
> src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.
>
> Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM.  Do any 
> of you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon 
> something in the ports - namely subversion and xz?  (And hopefully in 
> the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)
It is not a good idea. How do you see the way to compile the base 
without smth in base?
There is no problem with smth that uses smth ports-based, but not depend 
on smth ports-based.
What do you think about plugins?

rik
>
>