Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:59 -0400 From: "Brian McCann" <bjmccann@gmail.com> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal & fsck Message-ID: <2b5f066d0808280805t4c5f7051i60d02c7396c5f06d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d0808280803ibca3f61xbb167bce384f228@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b5f066d0808280705y3454c188v768efe46b388864b@mail.gmail.com> <g96d2h$sp2$1@ger.gmane.org> <2b5f066d0808280743g69c32d1rd30aee0ca276125@mail.gmail.com> <g96e22$1l7$1@ger.gmane.org> <2b5f066d0808280803ibca3f61xbb167bce384f228@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Brian McCann <bjmccann@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> Does gjournal complain about your drive, for example that it doesn't >> support BIOFLUSH? > > Actually yes...I meant to post them in my last message, but hit send > too early...here's my output from boot (from dmesg.boot) > > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 478661671: da1 contains data. > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 478661671: da1 contains journal. > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal da1 clean. > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE. CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): Invalid field in CDB > (da1:mly0:4:1:0): Unretryable error > GEOM_JOURNAL: BIO_FLUSH not supported by da1. > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 3065355517: da2 contains data. > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 3065355517: da2 contains journal. > GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal da2 clean. > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE. CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): Invalid field in CDB > (da2:mly1:4:0:0): Unretryable error > GEOM_JOURNAL: BIO_FLUSH not supported by da2. > >> >> Also, did fsck actually do something when it was started (did it find >> anything corrupted)? >> > No...it didn't find anything wrong / anything to fix. (and one of the > file systems was being written to at the time...so at least journaling > appears to be working) Something else I noticed...Manolis' article > says it should say "journal xxxx consistent"...whereas mine says > "Journal xxxx clean". I don't know what the differences mean, or what > the BIO_FLUSH means...but I'm hoping you can tell me. :) > > Thanks again! > --Brian > I should probably also mention that this is on a Mylex 2000 RAID controller...with a RAID-5 array and using write-caching. Thanks --Brian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2b5f066d0808280805t4c5f7051i60d02c7396c5f06d>