From owner-cvs-ports Wed Jul 1 19:21:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA12585 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:21:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA12573; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 19:21:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA20419; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 22:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 22:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Satoshi Asami cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/xzip Makefile In-Reply-To: <199807020039.RAA15282@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > Modified files: > games/xzip Makefile > Log: > Take out "x11" from category. Hmm... Looking over the commit logs, I see you've been doing this for a while. There are still an awful lot of ports that have x11 as a secondary category, however, and it's rather useful for identifying which ones use x11... What's the current policy on x11 as a secondary category? Further, are you planning to commit your patch to add fake X dependencies in the next round of "commits to bsd.port.mk"? If so, how should that be used? (Ie. what defines a dependency on X? Do tcl/Tk ports count?) FWIW, I rather liked the "x11 as a secondary category for all ports depending on X, except for Tk?? ports which have that as secondary category instead". -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk