From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 21 00:12:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA02585
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:12:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02541
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:11:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA15998; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 22:46:50 -0800 (PST)
To: ji@research.att.com
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports vs. packages 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jan 1998 01:13:42 EST."
             <199801210613.BAA25398@bual.research.att.com> 
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 22:46:50 -0800
Message-ID: <15995.885365210@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> not a problem), and packages for which there are no ports (which

1. Can you enumerate them?

2. Can you send this to ports@freebsd.org instead? :)

					Jordan