From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 25 15:15:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A7A16A403; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from opus.cse.buffalo.edu (opus.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FDD43D4C; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from localhost.cse.buffalo.edu (localhost.cse.buffalo.edu [127.0.0.1]) by opus.cse.buffalo.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id k8PFFv5W067920; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:15:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Ken Smith To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20060925141624.GA99043@rambler-co.ru> References: <200609251302.k8PD2wcG029663@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060925141624.GA99043@rambler-co.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FsK7a9qUasHKE2WsJW4f" Organization: U. Buffalo CSE Department Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:15:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1159197357.67224.16.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Bruce M Simpson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_var.h ip_output.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:15:58 -0000 --=-FsK7a9qUasHKE2WsJW4f Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 18:16 +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:02:58PM +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > bms 2006-09-25 13:02:58 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD src repository > >=20 > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > > sys/netinet in_var.h ip_output.c=20 > > Log: > > MFC: Account for output IP datagrams on the ifaddr where they will > > be sent from, not the first ifaddr on the ifp. > > =20 > > PR: kern/72936 > > Submitted by: alfred > > Reviewed by: andre > > Approved by: re@ > > =20 > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.53.2.3 +14 -3 src/sys/netinet/in_var.h > > 1.242.2.13 +11 -4 src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c > >=20 > Why are these insta MFCs? >=20 >=20 Sorry, I'm usually much better at making sure things have been in HEAD for long enough before approving them. But morning coffee hadn't kicked in before I started processing email today. :-( It helps a *little* bit if you folks only send in MFC requests after the minimal 3-day wait period. Some people do that, which is great. But others are in the habit of asking for the MFC approval immediately after the initial commit expecting us to hold on to it and reply later. Usually we manage to sort them out and do the right thing but that second approach has a higher risk factor and not just the risk of a premature approval (i.e. if you expect us to hold on to it we *might* forget about it by the time it's appropriate for approval and it'll be lost in the shuffle...). --=20 Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | --=-FsK7a9qUasHKE2WsJW4f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFF/Kt/G14VSmup/YRAomTAKCLsx1e/m2wurAnwPlrT4nZJ5lshgCgk4I3 GepAkKXqQShERnCyYXQUHhs= =lSkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FsK7a9qUasHKE2WsJW4f--