From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 23 07:07:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F041D1065674 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC53A8FC15 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-27-202.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.27.202]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEB7B847; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n3N77RBk001699; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:07:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:07:27 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Manolis Kiagias Message-Id: <20090423090727.c3460e7d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <49F01208.2080705@otenet.gr> References: <714DFCFC-9547-497D-A2C7-0BA10B39B901@mac.com> <49EF82B2.2040807@gmail.com> <49EF98C6.2060902@virtualhost.nl> <49EFA169.4050903@otenet.gr> <20090423084637.eb58cbe1.freebsd@edvax.de> <49F01208.2080705@otenet.gr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , questions@freebsd.org, VirtualHost Subject: Re: Modern FreeBSD Installer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:07:34 -0000 On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:00:24 +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > The text installer should always be the default, IMHO. A GUI installer > should be selectable i.e. from the boot options. > I hope Ivan Voras finds the time to continue with the finstall project, > it looked very promising: > > http://ivoras.sharanet.org/blog/tree/2009-02-19.what-happened-to-finstall.html As an option, yes; as a replacement... uhm, no, better not... > The problem here is that sysinstall *does* allow you to go back and redo > some steps, but then fails miserably and mysteriously > [...] > ...it does allow you to go back in a sort of way - but then fails many > times to continue normally. I don't deny that fact that this observation is possible, but I never found such a behaviour. Could you provide an example how to create a situation where sysinstall fails as you mentioned it? (It's a completely honest question.) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...