Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Mar 97 13:59:48 +0100
From:      garyj@frt.dec.com
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What ever happened to ...BISON ? 
Message-ID:  <9703041259.AA19989@cssmuc.frt.dec.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>  of Tue, 04 Mar 97 13:29:49 %2B0100.

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE writes:
> > 
> > pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co writes:
> > > Hi,
> > > BISON was part of the 2.1.5 tree (developers), but I don't see it
> > > referenced in the web pages. Was it included in the base distribution,
> > > it broke or what happened ?
> > > 
> > > Pedro.
> > 
> > bisdn was never in the tree in any shape. What was there was based on
> > ii.0.1, bisdn is based on ii0.2. The isdn support was also never a port;
> > it was under /sys/gnu and /usr/src/gnu.
> > 
> > IIRC bisdn was included as an experimental package with 2.1.5. This
> > version is now outdated.
> > 
> > At the moment there's no isdn support in the FreeBSD release.
> > 
> > Just to clarify things :)
> 
> Are we talking about /usr/src/contrib/bison (BISON) 
> or bisdn ?  - just to clarify things :-)
> 

woops. need to clean my glasses :)

---
Gary Jennejohn				(work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com
					(home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de
					(play) gj@freebsd.org





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9703041259.AA19989>