From owner-freebsd-multimedia Wed Oct 24 14:49: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mail.dvart.com (mail.dvart.com [64.79.2.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9858F37B405 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.dvart.com (mail.dvart.com [64.79.2.12]) by mail.dvart.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BFFCD2B; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) From: bruno schwander To: Randall Hopper Cc: Jason Andresen , multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxtv and real-time mpeg capture (status) In-Reply-To: <20011024162008.A1792@nc.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org true, I was referring to common resolution for standard VideoCD streams. (which was my original goal that prompted me to hack fxtv) bruno On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Randall Hopper wrote: > Hmmm. Last I heard, NTSC max res was pretty close to 640x480 "per frame". > > And for all the gory details: > > http://groups.google.com/groups?th=522e2fe553d94b6a > > Randall > > bruno schwander: > |quick answer:no. > | > |NTSC: 352x240 > |PAL : 352x288 > | > |;-) > | > |bruno > | > |On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Jason Andresen wrote: > | > |> Quick question: Why do you want to capture frames larger than 320x240? > |> Isn't that the native resolution of the (supposedly) NTSC signal the > |> card is recieving anyway? > > -- > Randall Hopper > aa8vb@nc.rr.com > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message