From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 2 8:47:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from galileo.poli.hu (polinet-gw.poli.hu [195.199.8.25]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95AA4018 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from faber.poli.hu ([195.199.8.29] ident=mail) by galileo.poli.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12G2tx-0000lG-00; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:45:09 +0100 Received: from mauzi (helo=localhost) by faber.poli.hu with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12G2u1-00015j-00; Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:45:13 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:45:13 +0100 (CET) From: Egervary Gergely To: Dan Nelson Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NMBCLUSTERS In-Reply-To: <20000202100739.B31919@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Interface type/speed is less important than number of open sockets. > I've got an NFS server with a 100mbit card in it that is pretty heavily > used the whole day, and after 22 days of uptime, netstat -m shows: > > 72/596/2112 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) > > That's just using whatever value of NMBCLUSTERS a 'maxusers 100' gives > me. hmm right. well I've just compiled with 4096, my statistics after 9 minutes uptime: 2308/3182/4096 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message