From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 17 09:03:17 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055D61065678;
	Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from matteo@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5B38FC44;
	Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from matteo@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (matteo@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4H93G7g079194;
	Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:16 GMT
	(envelope-from matteo@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from matteo@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m4H93G09079190;
	Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:16 GMT (envelope-from matteo)
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:16 GMT
Message-Id: <200805170903.m4H93G09079190@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: matteo@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, daichi@FreeBSD.org
From: matteo@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/123574: [unionfs] df(1) -t option destroys info for unionfs
	(and maybe other) mounts
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:03:17 -0000

Synopsis: [unionfs] df(1) -t option destroys info for unionfs (and maybe other) mounts

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->daichi
Responsible-Changed-By: matteo
Responsible-Changed-When: Sab 17 Mag 2008 09:01:35 UTC
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
User is running 6.3 which, IIRC, does not include the new unionfs implementation, but this
bug may be present in the new one too. Daichi surely knows whether this is the case.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123574