Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:12:28 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document powl and tgammal kludges Message-ID: <20171210171228.GB48536@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <DD9D5BE8-D9EE-44E9-AC48-89974AE5DDE9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20171209010205.GA42226@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <DD9D5BE8-D9EE-44E9-AC48-89974AE5DDE9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 9 Dec 2017, at 02:02, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > The following patch documents the remaining kludges that > > theraven@ committed in r255294 on 2013-09-06. I have > > cleaned up all of the others, but powl and tgammal remain. > > ngie@ seems to have documented the existence of powl with > > r290605, but did not document the rather poor numerical > > accuracy of the result. tgammal remains undocumented. As it > > is unlikely that theraven@ will document the nature of his > > kludge nor the existence of tgammal, I have have prepared > > a patch that documents the expected numerical accuracy in BUGS > > sections, and have also documented tgammal. > > Thanks, committed in r326748. > Thanks for the quick commit. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171210171228.GB48536>