From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 10:21:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A4316A4CE; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:21:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B6343D46; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:21:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229])i9EAKgON013071; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:20:54 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i9EAKZp5049725; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:20:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i9EAKZh2049724; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:20:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:20:35 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Denis Peplin Message-ID: <20041014102035.GA40978@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> cc: Tom Rhodes cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:21:10 -0000 On 2004-10-14 13:59, Denis Peplin wrote: > Hello! > > Please, look at patch attached. > I will commit it if no objections. No objections from here. I think it's a good change. [snip patch that substitutes s/daemon/service/ in `security/chapter.sgml'] The word `daemon' has a more UNIXy sound and is traditionally used when referring to the processes that implement a service, but IMHO what is controlled by tcpwrappers is not access to a process but to the service(s) this process provides. So the word `service' is more appropriate. - Giorgos