From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Thu Apr  1 06:22:57 2021
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1395BEEC8
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  1 Apr 2021 06:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk)
Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9tQm2JWJz4dKG
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2021 06:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk)
Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw3.dino.sk [84.245.95.254]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan)
 by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:22:48 +0200
 id 00DD639C.606566B8.0000401B
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:22:47 +0200
From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: No update for a day on ports?
Message-ID: <20210401082247.668e4394@zeta.dino.sk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i386-portbld-freebsd11.4)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F9tQm2JWJz4dKG
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-ports@dino.sk designates
 84.245.65.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-ports@dino.sk
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.30 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[84.245.65.72:from];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[dino.sk]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[84.245.65.72:from:127.0.2.255];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:5578, ipnet:84.245.64.0/18, country:SK];
 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
 MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:22:57 -0000

Hi,

did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update
ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No new
updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon or early
evening, but I did not consider asking then.

Is there some breakage in ports infrastructure? I see request comming
in on ports-bugs mailing list, but no update past revision 569609.
Also, I did not read anything on switching to git for ports, but I
would expect svn mirror for older (11 and 12) systems anyway as it is
done for src tree now.

Regards,
Milan