From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 22 11:42:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00180 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:42:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00124 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:42:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA39629; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:47:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:47:53 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: "Russell L. Carter" cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, dick@tar.com Subject: Re: Using LinuxThreads In-Reply-To: <199901221918.MAA02272@vip.consys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Russell L. Carter wrote: > |Maybe having just one pthread.h that pulls in the required headers > |based on a switch (eg. -DLINUXTHREADS) is the way to go? > > Doing this makes linuxthread support more or less "official", I would > think. > > I am for it. *confused look* somehow even though i've been trying to follow this thread i got lost. questions: 1) are 'linuxthreads' enabled by defualt now? 2) if not then 'make world -DLINUXTHREADS' ? 3) when it's decided can someone explain how to use this stuff nativly? thanks, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message