From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 30 20:25:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B802B0 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-ef5a-xen=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o3.shared.sendgrid.net (o3.shared.sendgrid.net [208.117.48.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 660692D41 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:25:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h=from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=c8i4Lzl7Mlt0LpuIJspE7R y4sBo=; b=JSjP+I5hLV6FZefpky9gekNppfCV0tTkf52LPFbd8ZQOhqjQeuYBte 0aDRihfcuZwcxuiLLpMZ2BffSzyo4sPxzhhN8hDFWO/p4zv2wdSfJ+atVAWPjwKZ KnjRKFLfyZwIdf8ovHK/gAQeD8/CoFp6EX49IDqPwnRC8wfM6C8AA= Received: by with SMTP id mf99.22444.5220FFC76 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:25:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.60.208.15]) by mi18 (SG) with ESMTP id 140d0e72379.5d09.32857d for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77576 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2013 20:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by ec2-107-20-205-189.compute-1.amazonaws.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2013 20:25:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22795 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2013 20:25:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 30 Aug 2013 20:25:07 -0000 Message-ID: <5220FFA3.6040809@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:25:07 -0700 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130816 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= Subject: Re: [CFR] Event channel Interrupts and unified Xen interrupt infrastructure. References: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org> <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> <5220A9CE.1090207@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <5220A9CE.1090207@citrix.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-SG-EID: HYUZykSZ9jYPqvLIDxmiHLTFoapJS5N/uhO1I8ZuJQ+BUOtFuDK/FuS3ylgITk2O7rC5Bcmki8ZPr+i2QH/cBX7rUAm0js58+SBosOfWHIPZsUTyC2Uhx7sibDhMQRAltsJvMEYK00EpOwWNz+mlow== Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 20:25:44 -0000 On 08/30/13 07:18, Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 wrote:=0D > I'm attaching a patch that introduces Xen support into GENERIC, it can=0D > be found as usual on my git tree:=0D > =0D > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpeople/royger/freebsd.git;a=3Dshortlog= ;h=3Drefs/heads/xenhvm_merge_generic=0D > =0D > It builds on top of my previous PVHVM series, which is now halfway=0D > committed to HEAD. I've tested it under Xen using the GENERIC kernel=0D > (for both i386 and amd64), and everything seems to be fine, and I've=0D > also tested it on bare metal amd64, which also seems to be running fine.= =0D =0D Looks good to me, I look forward to this getting into the tree.=0D =0D -- =0D Colin Percival=0D Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve=0D Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid= =0D