From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 27 04:27:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE75F16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:27:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B078143D46 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saturn@serv.net) Received: from armada.astral.realm (c-24-18-26-253.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[24.18.26.253]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050427042752015004k88fe>; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:27:52 +0000 From: Jeff To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:33:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050425183733.GB24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <2323.216.177.243.38.1114457612.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504262133.42669.saturn@serv.net> Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:28:00 -0000 I am experiencing the fxp0: device timeout as well. uname -a FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 23 19:52:42 UTC 2005 the kernel is the amd64 and I am running and amd64 processor - Jeff On Monday 25 April 2005 20:00, Mark Huizer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:33:32PM -0700, /dev/null wrote: > > I don't want to sound like a smart a$$, or know-it-all. But could this > > not also be a simple case of Induction? Is it possible that something has > > changed in the environment that might interfere with the NIC or cabling? > > I mean it wouldn't have to completely clobber the connection, but simply > > impeed it slightly, which would make it crap out under any type of load. > > Just thought I'd mention it FWIW. > > Well, if such a simple reinstall can make such a big difference, I would > sincerely start questioning computers ;-) > But apart from a table in the attic moving 10 centimeter, nothing > changed. > > Mark