From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  5 12:03:05 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AA7687;
 Tue,  5 Mar 2013 12:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB929BF;
 Tue,  5 Mar 2013 12:03:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.101])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA21556;
 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:02:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <5135DEF0.2060802@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:02:56 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: clang generated code sometimes confuses fbt
References: <5132387E.8010808@FreeBSD.org> <51323C62.4040506@FreeBSD.org>
 <51325FB3.7080300@FreeBSD.org> <51337018.30000@FreeBSD.org>
 <51337C27.7000105@FreeBSD.org> <5133AC3B.5040504@FreeBSD.org>
 <51348A6A.3070606@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <51348A6A.3070606@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:03:05 -0000

on 04/03/2013 13:50 Dimitry Andric said the following:
> Actually, that way of fixing breaks it for gcc, so it should really be
> fixed in sort_iidescs() instead.  See attached diff; I verified it works
> for both gcc-compiled and clang-compiled objects.

Impossible!  It looks like the attached diff was a nop change :-)

BTW, so changing clang to match gcc is not an option?
I do not insist, just curious.

-- 
Andriy Gapon