From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 13 12:46:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545B816A4D9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:46:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54009.mail.yahoo.com (web54009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D33DE43D48 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:46:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041013124644.12396.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.47.254.184] by web54009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:46:44 PDT Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:46:44 -0700 (PDT) From: spam maps To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <16748.11019.406954.729797@ran.psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: randy@psg.com Subject: Re: Re: 5.3-Beta7 / router & ntpdate: bug in bootup script or sequence? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:46:45 -0000 --- Randy Bush wrote: > an ntpd config hint > 2004.05.20 > > executive summary > o if you have a recent ntpd, use `ntpd -g`, > and be sure to start it before you go > multiuser if you have clock > lock security in multiuser Ah! Yes, apparently ntpd on 5.X is recent enough. Would it then make more sense to add "-g" to the default ntpd_flags in /etc/default/rc.conf ? And at the same time discourage the use of ntpdate in /etc/rc.conf, since that seems to be in conflict with other services starting up at boot? Rob. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com