From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 03:48:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1ED23A4; Fri, 9 May 2014 03:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp (elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.60.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D110BE1; Fri, 9 May 2014 03:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s493mIgn020397; Fri, 9 May 2014 12:48:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp) To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Centrino Wireless-N 1000 support is also broken (Re: iwn(4) in -HEAD supporting Centrino Wireless-N 135) References: <20140226123709.GA31099@syn.pertho.net> <530EE7F4.3080903@shurik.kiev.ua> <24791.1393550277@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <75498.1398751548@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <14909.1399545008@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; MH 6.8.4.JP-3.05; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?G?= =?ISO-8859-4?Q?oj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/22.3 (i386-portbld-freebsd8.4) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:48:18 +0900 Message-ID: <20396.1399607298@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> From: Kaho Toshikazu X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 03:48:21 -0000 Hello, Adrian Chadd wrote: > So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM? > before things get overridden? > > I'd like to figure out what that changed. In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1, sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality() was already fixed by r258085. 2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch. Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed, we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem. I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need, but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch. -- Kaho Toshikazu