Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:01:19 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206431] net/opensips: Update to 2.1.2
Message-ID:  <bug-206431-13-SYQgvq8QWS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206431-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206431-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206431

--- Comment #3 from Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> ---
(In reply to Euan Thoms from comment #2)

While on the subject. With regard to Poudriere. I was wondering if it does =
any
testing of the various permutations of the port options? When I do my port
development I test it with a regular 'make check-plist' with at least (i)
default port options (ii) no options turned on (iii) all options turned on.=
 If
it's a new port, I'll try to test all permutations (which of course is very
tedious). This is mostly for pkg-plist issues, which are in my experience t=
he
things that slip past QC the most often.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206431-13-SYQgvq8QWS>