From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue May 16 10:43:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC14D6F4D4 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C45933A for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4GAhkrO043292 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 10:43:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218849] Remove rc.conf jail configuration via jail_* variables Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:43:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: 000.fbsd@quip.cz X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9- mfc-stable10- mfc-stable11- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 10:43:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218849 --- Comment #28 from Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> --- (In reply to Jonathan Anderson from comment #27) I think the opposite way. Or we end up with the same problems as with ezjai= l, portupgrade, portmaster etc. now. Some features in base are stalled or very complicated just to not break 3rd party tools with no active maintainer. "because they are in Handbook" It would be better to document jails with base tools and just some list of = 3rd party tools with brief info about them and link to homepage of those projec= ts. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=