From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 13 10:06:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA04247 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jul 1996 10:06:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ime.net ([204.97.248.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04164 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 1996 10:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kimiko.tcguy.net (buxton-8.ime.net [206.231.148.137]) by ime.net (8.7.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA05527; Sat, 13 Jul 1996 13:05:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31E7D76C.3BEE@ime.net> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 13:05:48 -0400 From: Gary Chrysler Reply-To: tcg@ime.net Organization: The Computer Guy X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey CC: Jim Amy , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD CD Installation References: <199607131246.OAA11723@allegro.lemis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Greg Lehey wrote: > > > BTW, Gary's reply could have been construed to suggest that you can > have more than one slave on an IDE interface. That's not the case: > you can have exactly two configurations: > > - 1 drive only > - 2 drives; one master, one slave. > If thats how it read, I am sorry. That was _not_ my meaning! No you cannot have TWO masters or TWO slaves on the same interface! One must be master the other must be slave! Lets see if I can clearify myself without makeing it worse. :) I know that the original question involved 1 HD and 1 ATAPI CD. So the working solution should be: wd0: HD master CD slave And rip the secondary IDE controller out. (What I would of done in the first place!) My questions now are: wd0: HD master HD slave wd1: CD master Does this work anyone? (not revelant to original question) Or MUST it be wd0: HD master CD slave wd1: HD master (Not revelant to original question) I am not sure but I belive I read here in -questions that as long as you do actually have a slave on wd0 that a ATAPI cd will work on wd1 as master. Am I wrong?? (Not revelant to original question) It only fails if you _don't_ have a slave on wd0 and try to hook up an ATAPI cd on wd1 as master. (Revelant to original question) Thus: wd0: HD master HD slave wd1: CD master Works?? (not revelant to original question) or wd0: HD master CD slave works. (known) (revelant to the original question) And wd0: HD master wd1: CD master fails. (known) (revelant to the original question) Is this in fact how it is with FreeBSD 2.1r??? I'm sure that 2.1.5 will have this solved??? I don't have an ATAPI cd (I use SCSI) and would like very much to clear this up in my own head so I don't confuse those that I am trying to assist.. Thaks all. -Enjoy Gary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Improve America's Knowledge... Share yours The Borg... Where minds meet (207) 929-3848