From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu May  2 12:28:47 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F7C337B405; Thu,  2 May 2002 12:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g42JSe5W022660;
	Thu, 2 May 2002 15:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g42JSe4Q022657;
	Thu, 2 May 2002 15:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 15:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200205021928.g42JSe4Q022657@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Status of FreeRADIUS in the ports collection] 
In-Reply-To: <200205021800.g42I0vVa089809@cwsys.cwsent.com>
References: <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG>
	<20020502165028.GB16240@madman.nectar.cc>
	<200205021800.g42I0vVa089809@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Thu, 02 May 2002 11:00:57 -0700, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> said:

> If the maintainer doesn't object, I can put it on my list of things to 
> do.

I do not at all object.  This has been on my plate (particularly with
respect to fixing the broken Kerberos bits) for a long time now, and
every time I try to work on it, I end up pulling my hair in
frustration and moving on to something more productive, like reading
netnews.

>  I do however think that instead of using the nightly snapshot, 
> which can make the port obsolete in one evening, we should use the 
> latest public beta (0.5).

At the time the port was created, the snapshot was all there was.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message