From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 5 21: 7:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823C137B401; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6D43F85; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:07:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E742A8C1; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:07:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns In-Reply-To: <20030306041333.7884.qmail@web13403.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:07:22 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030306050722.E4E742A8C1@canning.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" wrote: > Guys; > > I have to agree with Terry that the fixes for netns > should be committed, and furthermore they should be > MFC (using his first patch perhaps). It's a nightmare > to try to rescue anything from the Attic, at least it > would be nice to have it in better shape before > killing it. They can be cleaned up and committed to RELENG_4 after the freeze is over. The original 4.x patch posted wasn't ready for commit though. (eg: externs scattered all over the place rather than declaring things properly in the include files). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message