From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 03:57:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44231106568B for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32798FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.162.219]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090825035723.YKWU1957.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:57:23 +0000 Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([124.188.162.219]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090825035723.PXJL13119.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:57:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 60925 invoked by uid 501); 25 Aug 2009 03:57:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:57:10 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20090825035710.GA60828@duncan.reilly.home> References: <20090825021135.GA70448@duncan.reilly.home> <20090825025435.59C591CC09@ptavv.es.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090825025435.59C591CC09@ptavv.es.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150204.4A936123.009A,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: rhE1FtH5TAD0zmQv0WC2OwcnyAzlq3Mv8Z4QX81loRIGTUDBp8PfStrHNvZRsMuxxDxJJhqGNGQnaa7nTY3RstCK Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADUP] FreeBSD Gecko's TODO and plan for future X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:57:26 -0000 On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:54:35PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:11:35 +1000 > > From: Andrew Reilly > > Maybe the list will get shorter if I just repeat the rebuild > > process a few times?... > > It will, but using the order from the command above will save time. For what it's worth, it took another three iterations, each much shorter than the last. So I'll leave worrying about the dependency graph stuff until the next time... > > That's good to know. It'd be nice to be able to get rid of > > firefox2, if it's not going to get security patches. > > Yes, as soon as I can build mplayerplug-in without it, it's history. And > none too soon. Yep: I now have a firefox2-free system. Great stuff. Thanks Joe, all. I wonder, though, doesn't libxul have the same security issues as gecko wrapped up in firefox2? Cheers, -- Andrew