From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 13:10:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D383337B401; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.tcoip.com.br (erato.tco.net.br [200.220.254.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C1343F85; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@tcoip.com.br) Received: from tcoip.com.br ([10.0.2.6]) by mail.tcoip.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3OK9p918711; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:09:51 -0300 Message-ID: <3EA8448E.5010607@tcoip.com.br> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:09:50 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pt-br, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <20030424171439.GA56367@sunbay.com> <3EA821A7.5000504@tcoip.com.br> <20030424175657.GB59206@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030424175657.GB59206@sunbay.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/loader compiled with NOFORTH X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:10:03 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:40:55PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > >>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> >>>On 5.x, loader(8) compiled with -DNOFORTH, results in >>>a system without a console. This does not affect the >>>RELENG_4. >>> >>>Can someone who knows this code please look into it? >> >>Curious, since boot disks are compiled without Forth. >> > > You sure they are? I somehow fail to see the code that > rebuilds sys/boot during "make release" with -DNOFORTH. Yes. FICL is unnecessary for the simple task of booting the installation kernel and takes quite a bit of space. Notes that this is _only_ for the _install_ floppy, and it is custom built for it. > > >>Maybe it's lack of acpi? >> > > No, acpi(4) was loaded. I experimented with bzip(2) > support in loader(8), and for this I needed the stripped > loader, because memory allocation really sucks in > i386 loader(8). Am I right it's limited to real mode's > 1M? I'm not sure what the exact memory constrains are, particularly since they changed somewhat when such issues were of interest to me. jhb can answer this, I think. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Gerencia de Operacoes Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados Coordenacao de Seguranca VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.br Outros: dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net Matter cannot be created or destroyed, nor can it be returned without a receipt.