From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 19:52:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D27106566C for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A029C8FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA28461; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:52:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TBWVZ-0002va-4y; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:52:29 +0300 Message-ID: <504F967B.6030108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:52:27 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120901 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Rachinsky References: <20120911161049.GA21635@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <504F6D9C.2040000@FreeBSD.org> <20120911191452.GA48029@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> In-Reply-To: <20120911191452.GA48029@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bug? with zfs, symlinks and extended attributes X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:52:33 -0000 on 11/09/2012 22:14 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: > * Andriy Gapon [2012-09-11 19:58 +0300]: >> on 11/09/2012 19:10 Nicolas Rachinsky said the following: >>> I can reliable "break" zfs on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 (on two different >>> machines). >> >> Please check if http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240345 may help you. >> I think that the diff should be applicable to your version. > > The patch applies fine, it compiles, but it does not help. > > Thanks for your efforts In your script do all those "xxx..." actually mean verbatim "xxx..." or are they just replacements for some scrubbed content? -- Andriy Gapon