From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 03:04:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD51916A400; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (gerbercreations.com [71.39.140.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DB913C44C; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5734qTY008201; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.1/8.13.3/Submit) id l5734pbP008200; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:04:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:04:51 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20070607030451.GA7879@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20070605062508.GA46961@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <200706061652.58614.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706061652.58614.jkim@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test the 'current' jdk 1.5 patchset X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:04:54 -0000 G'day Jung-uk, On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:52:55PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:25 am, Greg Lewis wrote: > > I realise that Update 12 was just released, but I think its worth > > getting the newer patchset out now and switch to Update 12 > > afterwards rather than stopping the release cycle at this point. > > I have built Update 12 with the same patchset + patches from ports + > the attached additional patches: Thats great, I appreciate the work you're doing with the Java port right now :). > %java -version > java version "1.5.0_12-p5" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.5.0_12-p5-jkim_06_jun_2007_12_43, mixed mode) > %sysctl kern.osreldate > kern.osreldate: 700043 > > Can we just skip Update 11? I think that the best course of action is to release the patchset as it currently is (I haven't heard of any showstoppers). I'll commit the port update immediately after that. Then lets wait for things to settle for a week and, assuming there haven't been any big problems, we can commit these patches to the port plus the necessary Makefile/distinfo patches. At the same time, Update 12 can be imported into the porting repo and OpenBSD and NetBSD people can give it a try too. Then in a month or two there will be a patchset 6 with official Update 12 support. I don't want to stop the release cycle now and go through all the import, build/test on multiple OSes/architectures steps again. That will not only hold up a new 1.5 patchset it will also delay 1.6.0_01 patchset that is ready to go (not to mention any OpenJDK work). -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org