From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 20:40:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0C916A4CE; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:40:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ABE43D2D; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.5.51] (adsl-64-171-186-189.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.186.189])j15KaUbs002508; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: <42052F4A.8060004@root.org> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:40:42 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (X11/20041205) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <20050205080115.CA94A16A4F9@hub.freebsd.org> <4204F39B.8050708@root.org> <4204FE06.4010007@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4204FE06.4010007@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:40:49 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Nate Lawson wrote: > >> Scott Long wrote: >> >>> scottl 2005-02-05 08:01:10 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD src repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/modules Makefile Log: >>> Only compile the cpufreq driver on i386 and amd64. >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.427 +3 -1 src/sys/modules/Makefile >> >> >> >> Is that due to a compile problem or just because the current hardware >> supported by that package is only found on i386 systems? >> sys/dev/cpufreq is going to be a whole set of MI drivers. The ichss.c >> driver should be MI in that it only accesses PCI registers. Please >> let me know if you had a problem and what was not fully MI, then >> revert this commit. >> > > I guess you missed the series of tinderbox failure messages? Nope, caught them and should be fixed. I asked since I was wondering if you had some other reason. Would you mind turning it back on now? -- Nate