From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr  1 03:08:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA17909
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 03:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA17900
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 03:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id UAA14960; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 20:57:55 +1000
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 20:57:55 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199604011057.UAA14960@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, j@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> There are many different real and virtual (timekeeping) clocks with
>> different frequencies:

>Should this become time(9)?

No, it has very little to do with time or the kernel.  clocks(7) would
be better, and half of it is i386-specific so it would need to be split
up.

I don't like section 9.  It is hard to improve on the sources, and harder
to keep up to date with the sources.

Bruce