From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jan  9 19:30:18 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA01496 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 19:30:18 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA01488 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 19:30:13 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA28578
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for freebsd.org!hackers); Mon, 9 Jan 1995 21:06:49 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA02324; 9 Jan 95 21:06:00 CST (Mon)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id VAA02321 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 1995 21:05:59 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199501100305.VAA02321@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: tk vs wksh
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 21:05:59 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 349       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

If wksh requires Motif you're going to have to ship it statically
linked with Motif due to licensing restrictions, and you won't be
able to rebuild it in the field. This is likely to wipe the size
advantage and makes it undesirable to standardize on (you know, the
Free in FreeBSD).

(I'm going to bed. I typoed 'hackers@freebsd.org' twice already)