From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Apr 29 17:43:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B3E37BB8A for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:43:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA02918 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2000 02:43:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id CAA10635 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2000 02:43:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7774337BB78; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:42:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA80234; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:42:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:42:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch(1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 29 Apr 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > So, any arguments for or against importing it into -CURRENT? Yeah, all those things it doesn't support yet are in active use. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message