From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 8 12:13:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931C7AA0F82 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:13:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749319C0 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (248.Red-83-39-200.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.39.200.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8095343BC4; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:13:26 -0600 (CST) To: FreeBSD Mailing List , george+freebsd@m5p.com From: John Marino Subject: Removing documentation X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B88664.3080004@marino.st> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:13:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:13:29 -0000 > Then allow me to be the second. But then, I find poudriere > unusable on my build system (I don't use ZFS and my memory is > apparently too limited). Portmaster just does the right thing. > > We get that you don't like portmaster. So please don't use it. > But don't deprive the rest of us. -- George Did you actually install it, use it, and compare? Or are you just saying this based on what you think it does? So far every former portmaster use that tried it (really tried it) has switch with one possible exception (he didn't see the rationale for the build logic so I don't know if he kept using it or not). And not one person until Mattias said portmaster was "easier". BTW, if your system is too limited for poudriere, then likely you couldn't use tmpfs with Synth, so you'd lose out on a lot of performance. It would still be better than live building though.