From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 22 3:42:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA1F37B401; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A6643EA3; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 03:42:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Sunbay) with ESMTP id gAMBgEbS022327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:42:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAMBgBkP022320; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:42:11 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:42:11 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Kris Kennaway , John Baldwin , Terry Lambert , current@FreeBSD.ORG, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: Why isn't NOCLEAN the default? (was: Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD) Message-ID: <20021122114211.GD11000@sunbay.com> References: <3DDD2CB8.7E080912@mindspring.com> <20021121220220.GB6062@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20021121223608.GA20967@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20021121224800.GD6062@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021121224800.GD6062@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:48:01PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Kris Kennaway : > > > I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to > > > be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it > > > seems a bit conservative to make incremental world builds require > > > that an undocumented variable be defined. Any ideas? > >=20 > > It often causes problems during upgrades (but is usually fine when > > just rebuilding a non-updated tree) >=20 > Sounds reasonable. Maybe it should be documented in build(7), though. >=20 Yet it's documented in make.conf(5). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE93hgTUkv4P6juNwoRArWDAJ0cihaH+vFAYrXw4cWAECX6CYxRTgCSApqu rYQdeEQ3H6EZo4HL/qkprg== =0bFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wb5NtZlyOqqy58h0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message