Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 05:32:48 +0200 (CEST) From: "Michael C. Vergallen" <mvergall@mail.double-barrel.be> To: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sig11 in make buildworld, ok to do make -DNOCLEAN buildworld to "resume"? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9904150524450.2840-100000@ns.double-barrel.be> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904142244250.1166-200000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
from my experience with compiling with gcc and sig11's is that if the frequency is quite high one is better to fix the hardware fault first before atempting to compile anything and certainly when building the OS itself. now you could try restartng the make process by using -DNOCLEAN but eh your build will probably fail again and again. BTW have you read the sig11 faq and seen the possible temporary fixes you can aply like disabling cache and the likes. If not read the file it's on ftp.metalab.edu somewhere.. Michael --- Michael C. Vergallen A.k.A. Mad Mike, Sportstraat 28 http://www.double-barrel.be/mvergall/ B 9000 Gent ftp://ftp.double-barrel.be/pub/linux/ Belgium tel : 32-9-2227764 Fax : 32-9-2224976 On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Matt Behrens wrote: > I had a sig11 in my make buildworld today. (Yes, the RAM gets > replaced as soon as I can; I've been getting a few lately.) > > My question is -- can I do a ``make -DNOCLEAN buildworld'' to > resume, in a manner of sorts? Is there a better way? Or should > I just wait until the problem is resolved and scrap the whole obj > tree? > > Attached is the last bits of make buildworld's log in case it has > any relevance. > > Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> > Owner/Administrator, zigg.com > Chief Engineer, Nameless IRC Network > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9904150524450.2840-100000>