Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:08:47 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: blue term color in xorg (was: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion) Message-ID: <20040725150847.GA19015@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10407251057140.22396-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20040725104510.GA10921@saltmine.radix.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10407251057140.22396-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 11:04:51AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >=20 > The question was why are the colors different. I failed to find > an answer in any of the replies. After searching the rather large > changelog, I find in Patch #180 - 2003/10/12 - XFree86 4.3.99.15: >=20 > "use color resource setting from Debian package for xterm VT100 > widget, since the choice of blues provides better contrast." "blue" is what we're talking about. as well as color4 and color12. see also the note relating to the latter, which gives some of the background in the related Debian bug report. =20 > If the default color scheme was purposely changed, would not an > easier answer had simply been "the default color scheme has > changed; use Xdefaults to tailor"? that would have been an oversimplification. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFBA8z9tIqByHxlDocRAk5cAKCnLJ3ZguhXfMFgj3wsncdJ9ZdMfgCcCzsV dxyeL3lwhjDd6e/Ig23DXTQ= =FWqM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040725150847.GA19015>